CBCT Reporting Level 1 — Online Course · self-paced · start today
New £195+VAT 5 hrs verifiable CPD Learn at your own pace
Start the course

Search 360 Visualise

↑ ↓ navigate ↵ open ESC close ⌘K shortcut
Get in touch
We'll get back to you within a few hours
Enquiry Form
AI-planned crown and implant in the UL6 site, shown on a CBCT 3D render with intraoral scan overlay
Home › Clinical Insights › AI Implant Planning
Implantology AI Planning CS 3D Imaging Premium

AI-Assisted Implant Planning: Crown First, Implant Second

A missing upper left first molar, a sinus close by, and a patient who had already seen what happens when a gap is left alone. Dr Kunal Shah planned the crown first and let the software propose the implant.

Dr Kunal Shah Dr Kunal Shah
5 min read
October 2026
UL6
Implant site
8 x 9
CBCT volume
Crown first
Planning approach
Freehand
Surgical approach
01 The clinical challenge

A 40-year-old man came in with discomfort when chewing on his upper left side. He was medically fit and well. The upper left first molar (UL6) was missing. Food was packing into the space, and he found the area hard to keep clean.

He had a clear reason to act. More than ten years earlier he lost his lower left second premolar, and the first molar behind it drifted into the gap. He did not want the same thing to happen again, or for the opposing tooth to over-erupt.

Every option was discussed: no treatment, a removable prosthesis, a fixed bridge, and an implant. He already had an implant in his upper right quadrant, so he knew the process. He chose an implant.

Fig. 1 — CBCT 3D render showing the edentulous UL6 region, the opposing teeth and the sinus region Fig. 2 — CBCT 3D render with the intraoral scan overlaid in green
Fig. 1 & 2 A 3D render gives an overview of the missing UL6, the opposing teeth and the sinus region (left). The same view with the intraoral scan overlaid (right).
02 The approach

Clinical and radiographic assessment confirmed enough bone for an implant, with good periodontal health and nothing to rule implant treatment out. The anatomy to respect was the maxillary sinus, which sat close to the planned site.

An 8 x 9 volume was taken on a Carestream Dental CBCT. An intraoral scan was then imported and matched to it in CS 3D Imaging Premium.

Fig. 3 — AI arch mapping in CS 3D Imaging Premium with the intraoral scan overlay showing the soft tissue
Fig. 3 The AI maps the arch. The intraoral scan overlay shows where the soft tissue sits.

Planning was crown first. The ideal crown was set before any implant was placed on screen. The software's AI-assisted auto implant planning then proposed an implant position based on that crown, the surrounding anatomy and the bone available.

Dr Shah checked the proposal against the things that matter in the posterior maxilla: the distance to the sinus, the bucco-palatal width of the ridge, and the angulation.

Fig. 4 — Cross-sections showing the planned implant position in relation to the ridge, angulation and maxillary sinus
Fig. 4 Cross-sections show the planned implant against the ridge, the angulation and the sinus, following prosthetically driven planning principles.
Fig. 5 — AI auto implant placement in CS 3D Imaging Premium, cross-sectional view of the UL6 site
Fig. 5 AI auto implant placement in CS 3D Imaging Premium.
03 The outcome

The digital plan could have been turned into a surgical guide. In this case Dr Shah chose a conventional freehand approach, with the plan as his reference. The implant was an Anthogyr Axiom X3, chosen for its suitability in the posterior maxilla.

The implant was placed successfully in the UL6 region.

Fig. 6 — Final AI-planned crown and implant position in the UL6 site
Fig. 6 The final crown and implant position.

AI-generated proposals are an adjunct, not a replacement for clinical judgement. The clinician stays fully responsible for checking the proposed plan and changing it where needed.

— Based on the clinical findings of Dr Kunal Shah
04 Key takeaways
A

Want to learn implant planning hands-on?

The 360 Implant Academy is two hands-on days at Octagon House in Yorkshire. Plan a real case, print your own surgical guide, then place an implant on the model you take home. 16 delegates, 12+ CPD hours, £495 + VAT.

See the 360 Implant Academy →
What this case means for your practice
01

Plan the crown, then the implant. Setting the restoration first means the implant goes where the tooth needs it, not only where the bone is easiest.

02

AI planning saves time at the planning stage. Dr Shah reports reduced planning time and simpler data handling, with the CBCT and intraoral scan matched in one place.

03

You can see the risk before you pick up a drill. Bone dimensions, crown position and the distance to the sinus are all visible on one plan.

04

The software proposes. You decide. A sound grasp of surgical anatomy, prosthetic principles and conventional implant workflows is still what makes the outcome predictable.

Dr Kunal Shah
About the clinician
Dr Kunal Shah BDS PGCE
Principal Dentist · Leo Dental, London
Dr Shah is the Principal Dentist at Leo Dental in London, with a clinical focus on dental implantology and digital dentistry. An early adopter of CBCT imaging and AI-assisted workflows, he works in a fully digitised practice with in-house CBCT. He is also involved in postgraduate education and implant training.
Software used in this case
Carestream
CS 3D

CS 3D Imaging Premium

Matches your CBCT and intraoral scan, sets the crown and proposes the implant position with AI. 360 Visualise supplies, installs and supports it alongside the Carestream CBCT range.

See CS 3D Imaging Premium →

Want to plan implants like this in your own practice?

Scroll to Top